Video on Rumble and Vimeo with subtitles and MP4 1080p 4k. Citations [xx.yy] are document ID’s to lookup in this spreadsheet which contains links1.
The vaccine ingredient scientists want to forget
The scientific literature expressly identifies four sources for the antigens (HBsAg) that were the active ingredient in Hepatitis B vaccines, based on year of manufacture:
Retroactive testing of archived blood samples revealed that the only confirmed carriers of the AIDS virus in the Western Hemisphere during the early 1970s were the chimpanzees used to make the Hepatitis-B vaccines[7.26, 7.28, 7.30]. Some of the chimps were the PTT subspecies captured in 1963 in the Congo River Basin—the same group of chimps whose blood scientists agree caused the AIDS pandemic[7.18]. They carried the SIVcpzus variant that is the closest ancestor to the deadly HIV-1B variant first detected in 1978 in New York gay men who were participating in the vaccine trial for Merck Lot 751—one of the Hepatitis-B vaccines made from that blood[7.21]. The patents suggests 10 to 100 million people may have been vaccinated with the chimpanzee-blood based vaccines made between 1973 and 1980.2
During the Merck lot 751 trial on gay men, the WHO wrote: “The question which now looms large is how to ensure that the current candidate hepatitis vaccines are free of these viruses.”[10.51] Dr. Wolf Szmuness, who ran the trial, said he feared being branded a murderer and jailed when a comparison of the vaccine vs placebo rate suggested the vaccine had transmitted yet unknown viruses[3.22]. In 1982, doctors began suspecting the new AIDS disease that emerged during the trial among participants was caused by the vaccine[10.57]. That year Dr. Szmuness was jailed for “deranged behavior”3 and died within a month of officials confirming all participants with AIDS had received vaccine, not placebo[4.10], and that six of 10 AIDS cases were participants[10.30]. The CDC conceded all participants were HIV-negative before the first vaccinations in 1976[4.03], and by the trial end 42% of the fully vaccinated were HIV+ vs 25% partially vaccinated vs 9% of the unvaccinated placebo[4.15]. However, use of the vaccine continued when Dr. Fauci was appointed to run the government’s AIDS response and 3 weeks later the CDC Director told the NY Times: “It is clear, absolutely clear, that this vaccine is safe. It does not contain the AIDS virus, and even if it did, the data demonstrate that the virus would be killed by inactivation steps used in the manufacturing process.”[10.38]
All notable AIDS outbreaks followed likely vaccination with one of the chimp-blood based vaccines.4 The only exception were the Romanian orphans, and scientists concluded most had been infected by injection[107.11, 107.12, 107.13].
The censorship of the use of chimpanzee-blood in vaccines between 1973 and 1980 was so thorough that even early AIDS victims and researchers who blamed the Hepatitis-B vaccine seemed unaware chimp-blood was the active ingredient, and assumed HIV must have been added intentionally as a bioweapon to eradicate gay men5. Further, nobody publicly noted that Dr. Prince’s chimps were used for “liver dialysis” since the 1960’s providing a mechanism for the native chimp variant of the virus (SIVcpzus) to evolve into the deadly HIV-1B in New York undetected.
Leveraging extensive research by @pizzapicklespur, @sperber_aron, and @Looking4critic1, Fact Mission unveils the first complete timeline documenting the vaccine ingredient scientists want to forget. Here are some examples:[4.27]
In Chapter 50, Dr. Alfred Prince, who worked at New York Blood Center (NYBC), announced his lab produced a vaccine called “B-Vax”[103.07]. The book’s next chapter, written by Merck’s vaccine head Maurice Hilleman, shows “B-Vax” was developed in parallel with Merck’s Lot 751 which references the same antigens[107.09,4.05]. It is the same lot referenced by the CDC in “The Prevention of Hepatitis B with Vaccine: Report of the Centers for Disease Control Multi-Center Efficacy Trial Among Homosexual Men”[4.08], which ran until 1982. It’s the same lot referenced by apartheid scientists to be administered to exclusively black communities in Africa as part of an expanded WHO program well into the 1990’s[6.08,6.23,6.24]:
Citation #7 details the vaccines’ active ingredient[3.28]:
Here are the populations he proposed inoculating with that chimpanzee blood:
The patents confirm chimpanzee plasma was the preferred source material for Hepatitis-B vaccines of that era[4.04]:
The patents reveal the first chimpanzee blood vaccines tested on humans were made in 1973 by Merck and NIAID, Dr. Fauci’s agency, stating “Prince… discloses a vaccine against type B hepatitis infections… Hepatitis B antigen was purified from 8 liters of chimpanzee plasma (type ad), 5 liters of human plasma (type adx) and 2 liters of human plasma (type ayx).” Since 1966 the scientists “attempted to transmit human hepatitis to chimpanzees”[3.32], concluding “the chimpanzee is the only available susceptible animal”[3.15], and the “HBsAg [the vaccine’s active ingredient] present in captive chimpanzees is antigenically indistinguishable from HBsAg or anti-HBs obtained from man”[3.32].
The document lists two 1973/1974 vaccines:
Purcell and Gerin worked at NIAID. Buynak worked for Maurice Hilleman of Merck who “sought out homosexual men and drug users, groups at the highest risk of hepatitis B infection. (Many of these people lived in flophouses, stairwells, doorways, and fire escapes in the Bowery, one of the New York City's most notorious neighborhoods)”[7.11]. The first suspected AIDS casualty which cannot be traced back to Africa6 was a girl born one year later, in 1974, to a New York heroin user a couple years before a “junkie disease syndrome” swept the city, now considered the first likely AIDS outbreak in the Western Hemisphere[7.88].
There’s indirect evidence that HIV was circulating in 1976 among New York heroin users, the group targeted by the 1974 vaccine[107.08]. But I found no mention of archived blood from that community. In September, 2023 I offered a $1,000 reward in good faith for evidence of a lab-confirmed HIV-positive human sample from the Western Hemisphere, collected during the virus's initial year of emergence. The only caveat: The sample could not come from an individual involved in the trial testing the vaccine[4.04, 4.05, 7.21]. My outreach to hundreds of involved scientists resulted in mostly “no comments”, a handful of vitriolic attacks demanding I cease the investigation, a couple friendly warnings that this research is dangerous—but nobody disputed that every early HIV+ human in the Western Hemisphere had been participating in the vaccine trial at the time of infection.
All this time US officials have at their fingertips the data to definitively prove or disprove vaccine transmission because the 2 trials on the US gay community were placebo-controlled. However, the CDC only released the placebo breakdown for one subset, mentioned earlier, and per their FOIA responses, they “lost” the rest of the data for the taxpayer-funded trial they themselves conducted7. They refuse to release samples or test results for the chimps used to make the vaccines. They deceptively claim to have released test results for implicated vaccines[4.20,4.22], but in reality have only released results for vaccines made in the 1980’s using human blood and an updated inactivation process, without acknowledge their implicated 1970’s versions were made with a different process using chimpanzee blood.
They dismiss the AIDS outbreak during the gay trials as a coincidence claiming the men contracted the virus in Haiti without acknowledging WHO reports suggest Haitians may have been inoculated with the same vaccine one year after New York gay men. In 2 minutes this video shows the government's own data does not support their official narrative.
Fact Mission’s quest is getting the “lost” trial data despite the obstruction of scientists and officials, many of whom are accused of causing and covering up the COVID and Ebola pandemics as well. Recovering this data will settle whether they caused the AIDS pandemic, and their lack of accountability let the same scientists get away with it again in the 2014 Ebola outbreak and 2020 COVID pandemic. Critically, this will prove if, after knowing that the chimpanzee-blood-based lots transmitted HIV, they watched and said nothing while South Africa's “highly motivated” apartheid regime provided “enthusiastic support” for an expanded WHO program to administer the leftover 1970's chimp-blood lots exclusively to black communities across Sub-Saharan Africa[6.23].
Establishing consensus
To encourage fact-checking of the theory, we wish to start by at least establishing consensus that the following basic facts relating to Merck’s 1976 Lot 751 are universally accepted:
It was given to America’s gay community between 1976-1982[4.05], Eastern Chinese Farming Villages in 1982[5.03], and exclusively black communities in South African starting in 1983[6.08, 6.24] . All experienced AIDS outbreak ~4 years later.
When it was made in 1976, the only lab-confirmed HIV in the Western Hemisphere was in the chimpanzees used to develop it[3.21, 4.04, 7.26, 7.28, 7.30]8
Every one of the lab confirmed early HIV+ humans in the Western Hemisphere was participating in the trial to test Lot 751[7.21], and the earliest cases for which indirect evidence exist correlate with the New York heroin users and gay men who received it or the prior 1973 NIAID/Merck chimp-vaccine before the trial.
The evidence the AIDS virus had been “inactivated”, thus justifying its continued use in Africa, was:
The CDC claimed the HIV in the vaccine had been “inactivated” by the formalin (formaldahyde) in the vaccine[4.22]. BUT: The CDC’s internal report actually stated: “Formalin at 0.10% [4x-10x the concentration used in the vaccine] was found to reduce reverse transcriptase activity, but complete inactivation was not achieved after 2 hr of exposure.”[4.32]
The CDC claimed proof of inactivation came from comparing “rates of AIDS in groups of homosexually active men who did or did not receive HB vaccine in the vaccine trials conducted by CDC”[4.20]. The ambiguous wording implies they compared vaccine vs placebo. BUT: The only CDC paper that broke down HIV rates by vaccine vs placebo actually showed a 5x higher rate in vaccine recipients, and now the CDC claims they “lost” the trial data.
Dr. Robert Garry, authored “Proximal Origins”, credited with “proving” COVID’s natural origins. In 1990 he presented in two ancient HIV+ tissue samples that predated and exonerated the vaccine[10.78]. BUT: Independent DNA testing revealed the first as an elaborate hoax passing off remains of a fresh AIDS victim[7.05], and he reported his 2nd sample was “inadvertently destroyed” when independent researchers attempted to test it.9
Correcting inaccuracies
FactMission seeks to tackle controversies with universally accepted facts. To encourage engagement, we are offering a $1,000 reward to the first person who provides clear evidence that any of the "Statements of Fact" above or in the transcript (in bold) are demonstrably false. This evidence must come from credible, published sources that have not been retracted or disputed.
Did the global health leaders now demanding we accept their pandemic treaties, vaccine passports and digital id’s cause the death of 47 million? Did they allow the eradication of black African communities to keep their secret?
We are documenting all responses to our good faith outreach to scientists, many with first hand knowledge and at the center of today's public health programs. Should we trust those who respond to the death of 47 million with “no comment”?
Video transcript
COVID, Ebola and AIDS were all 3 blamed on lab experiments of Anthony Fauci.10 And he enlisted this same Proximal Origins author to prove all 3 viruses' natural origins[10.78,10.79]. The US Congress has once again denied our requests to question Dr. Fauci about anything other than COVID, by far the least lethal with the least amount of hard evidence.
Let's analyze the other 2. Did the same Proximal Origins authors also cover up earlier lab experiments that killed more people than the world wars?
Dr. Garry first came to Dr. Fauci’s rescue in 1990 after scientists had tested scores of archived blood for HIV, the AIDS virus[10.78]. Prior to Dr. Garry’s report the earliest HIV positive samples in the Western Hemisphere came from these chimpanzees in US government labs[7.26,7.28,7.30].
They had been used by these scientists at Dr. Fauci’s agency to develop these Hepatitis-B vaccines[4.27,7.77]. The earliest HIV-positive human blood had been collected entirely among the 20,000 gay men they had recruited to test it[7.21]. All participants were HIV-negative before the trial, and nearly half were HIV+ when it ended[4.07].11
Dr. Garry was brought in after HIV had been identified and South Africa’s apartheid regime finished trials of that very same vaccine lot[6.08], but this time on a cluster of black, rural, conservative Christian farming villages, known for their strict prohibition of sex outside of marriage[6.05]. As in the US gay community, all of South Africa’s straight black communities were AIDS-free before the trial[107.02,6.07]. But, following inoculation with the same 1976 Lot 751, those farming villages became the hardest hit with a 40% rate comparable to the gay men.12
Dr. Garry’s AIDS Origin papers[10.78] were credited with proving it was a coincidence that another HIV outbreak occurred during another trial 7 years later, on the opposite side of the globe, with opposite demographics, that had nothing in common, except the same 1976 Lot 751, made using HIV-positive chimpanzees.
Remember, this is the one vaccine the maker admits was made from blood heavily contaminated with HIV[7.11]. The CDC claimed the HIV had been inactivated[4.22], justifying its continued sale exclusively in Africa for another 8 years (referring to chimpanzee-blood based versions like Lot 751, as post-1984 it appear everywhere else got human-blood versions made using an updated inactivation process).
Dr. Garry received grants to study unexplained historic deaths like this teenager. He reported that tests on archived tissue samples proved that both the teenager and another man were HIV-positive when they died before implicated vaccines[10.78]. Dr. Garry then received $17 million for AIDS research13. However, years later, independent DNA verification exposed the first alleged ancient tissue sample as an elaborate hoax, trying to pass off remains of a recent AIDS victim, despite claims of strict chain of custody protocols using hazmat suits and sterilized equipment[7.05]. His 2nd sample was then inadvertently destroyed before it could be verified. Yet, just like his COVID Proximal Origins paper, his AIDS origins papers were never retracted and nobody has ever been willing to reopen the case.
Unable to believe something so obvious had been swept under the rug, last September I tagged hundreds of scientists, respectfully offering in good faith a $1,000 reward for any evidence proving the existence of early HIV-positive cases in the US not participating in that vaccine trial. Nothing. My offer is still open.
History repeated in 2014 when the Ebola epidemic emerged next to Dr. Garry’s own African lab. Staff allegedly conducted experiments on the deadly virus with only goggles, gloves and masks to keep costs down. Dr. Garry similarly claimed his Fauci-funded lab was exonerated by identifying “Patient Zero'' as a boy playing in a bat infested tree. Congress also refused to ask Dr. Fauci for comment on the father’s claim his son actually died of malaria at 18 months, never went to that tree, which officials tested and found no trace of Ebola, arguing the real patient zero lived next to the lab.
The CDC claimed similar HIV rates in their trial's placebo group irrefutably proved they had not spread AIDS[4.20]. But I discovered the CDC did a switcheroo, and filed a FOIA request for the real number. In response to my FOIA request for the real number, the CDC now claims they lost their trial data with the proof they had not caused more deaths than the world wars.14 The nation's top FOIA firm agreed to take over. ICAN generously contributed and even set up a dedicated fund. And I've registered FactMission as a non-profit to establish consensus.
Before asking for your support, I want to show you the significance of this pivotal number and ease your mind that Dr. Fauci’s own scientists concede all the facts I'm about to present. So notify experts that the $1,000 reward has been expanded to publicly correct the record if any statements of fact in this video are inaccurate. I will be updating the page with all responses and, ideally, their counter arguments, allowing you to have an informed opinion after considering various points of view. Or after the scientific community responds with "no comment".
AIDS timeline
1971
In 1971, scientists working at Dr. Fauci’s agency made their first in-house Hepatitis-B vaccine[4.27]. The active ingredient was blood plasma from “volunteers” at Willowbrook. The “volunteers” were the mentally disabled children you now see. They were intentionally infected with hepatitis by being fed feces.
1974
In 1974, those same scientists produced a 2nd generation vaccine, blaming the delay on the need to find alternative production methods given the “changing social concepts concerning the use of human volunteers”[4.27]. This new version was made using newly patented antigens from the blood of chimpanzees[7.77]15, the only animal capable of producing usable antigens after infection with human hepatitis[3.15]. They were harvested by Dr. Alfred Prince. He ran the nation’s top chimp research facility, located in New York. Since the 1950’s Dr. Prince demonstrated that human and chimpanzee blood are interchangeable[3.32]. He used his 200 chimpanzees to treat Hepatitis by connecting them intravenously to human patients of the same blood type, allowing the chimps' livers to purify the mixed, raw blood freely flowing between the species[3.03]. Dr. Prince argued this was how chimpanzees paid their dues to the society saving them from extinction, as their robust immune systems eliminated hepatitis with the ease of drinking a glass of water[4.26]. The care manuals suggest the same chimps were used repeatedly[3.04], meaning the human plasma he provided for vaccines, if collected from his patients, may have also contained chimpanzee blood.16
1976
Dr. Prince obtained multiple patents on the use of chimpanzee blood for human vaccines, and by 1976 reported Hepatitis-B vaccines were being made from his chimpanzee plasma[4.04]17. To meet global demand, he opened a controversial chimpanzee facility in Africa, capturing wild chimps, infecting them with Hepatitis, harvesting antigens, and releasing them. Years later, with vaccines using recombinant antigens, the 66 remaining chimps were abandoned and left for dead on islands with no natural food. Volunteers had to rescue them as the company, which amassed $450 million while harvesting their antigens, refused to pay for their care or relocation[107.07].18
It appears the "volunteers" for these chimpanzee-based vaccines were heroin users who “lived in flophouses, stairwells, doorways, and fire escapes in New York City"[7.11]. A couple years later a “junkie disease syndrome” emerged in that city. Ten years later when a test for HIV became available, 3 children born to affected mothers would test positive[7.88].
There’s no record Dr. Prince allowed testing of his chimpanzees. However, archived blood from chimpanzees imported at the same time and housed at the NIH’s New Mexico facility were tested. Some of the blood was HIV-positive. Later genetic sequencing would find they carried the closest ancestor to the HIV variant that sparked the imminent AIDS pandemic[7.26,7.28,7.30].19
1977
In 1977 Dr. Fauci was appointed Deputy director when this project began testing solutions for mass production. The exorbitant cost of Dr. Prince’s patented chimpanzee antigens sparked a global gold rush to harvest low-cost human antigens[3.14,3.15]. Some projects targeted areas with high rates from poor sanitation infrastructure, such as Brazil, Africa and the Caribbean[10.48,10.72]20. In Haiti they struck liquid gold in 1 in 7 veins[10.58] with each antigen rich Haitian ironically living on less than $1 per day but carrying millions in antigens. In Europe and the United States only young gay men and drug users had high rates without intentional infection[10.62,10.63]. In the US around 20,000 gay men were recruited[4.02,4.07]. Those with natural immunity were excluded but monitored. Those unexposed were given an existing chimpanzee / human blood vaccine to test efficacy[4.05]. And those with an active infection apparently were under the impression the health officials hanging out in gay bathhouses benevolently collected their blood every few months to monitor disease progression, when in fact, they were harvesting antigens to make Merck’s upcoming commercial vaccine[3.22]. Retroactive testing of those samples and countless others would reveal this was the last year that all human blood collected in the Western Hemisphere was free of HIV. The only laboratory-confirmed HIV-positive beings at this point were the chimpanzees being used to make the vaccines.
1978
In 1978 the first HIV positive human blood samples were collected in this hemisphere. All came from gay men participating in the Hepatitis vaccine trials[7.21].
Less lethal HIV variants had already been circulating in Africa around the epicenter in Kinshasa, Congo[7.02].21 The first samples were collected in that city one year after inoculating residents[2.05] with an unrelated vaccine of which the maker originally said:
“The virus was cultivated on chimpanzee kidney cells”
French scientists at the Pasteur Institute made that documentary blaming AIDS on the 1958 polio vaccine. But they did not mention that after 20 years HIV had barely spread beyond Kinshasa[6.01] when they developed their own Hepatitis vaccine with the same New York supplier[10.08,10.81]. The French version was tested on gay communities in Europe and developing countries in Africa and Asia. In rural Chinese villages vaccinated 4 years after the US trials[5.03,5.04], AIDS will appear 4 years after its US emergence. 11% of those villagers will be infected with the deadly 1B variant that was just emerging in the US gay community and had never been seen before in Africa[10.82,10.83].
1979
In 1979 scientists wanted to abort, fearing they had infected those men with live viruses they could not test for[3.22]22. Scientists worried the vaccines “have used either thermal inactivation or formol… However, experimental data accumulated… suggests these methods may not be fully reliable”[103.19]. The WHO wrote: “The question which now looms large is how to ensure that the current candidate hepatitis vaccines are free of these viruses.”[10.51]
They were warned aborting would hinder sales and further fuel vaccine hesitancy. A senior FDA scientist had recently destroyed her career by reporting that monkey viruses in an unrelated vaccine caused cancer, defying orders to stay quiet[2.07].
The FDA and NIH had allowed this vaccine trial to proceed despite grave concerns it might transmit live viruses. Fearing the same, Albert Sabin, one of the most respected vaccine inventors had written the vaccine will not be used in any human being and he would go to court to testify against the makers if they did. The vaccine maker replied “I couldn't wait any longer. I was going to go ahead and put this into people”[7.11]. However, he did not let his lab staff take it for fear it might transmit a live virus and that “would be the end of the product”.
1980
In 1980, gay men began developing a cancer called Kaposi's sarcoma[10.44], caused by two unrelated viruses: HIV and Kaposi's sarcoma Herpes Virus or HHV-8[10.15]. The project’s chimpanzees harbored the closest ancestor to both[7.26,10.17]. They have different transmission routes; HIV is primarily sexual, rarely oral[10.69]. Kaposi’s Sarcoma is the opposite, mainly oral, rarely sexual23. The new quote “gay cancer” required simultaneous co-infection with both chimpanzee viruses[107.06]. Without exception, every one of these early cases lived at a trial site, and the dual infection was rarely seen in other cities, where AIDS cases were mostly HIV only[10.15]. Nearly all cases appeared during the incubation period of trial participants, and largely vanished as the participants died off[10.23]. Unlike HIV, Kaposi's Sarcoma did not correspond to sexual activity[10.15].
It would take over 10 years to discover these early cases had been infected with 2 different viruses. Dr. Robert Gallo would dismiss it as an enigma[10.05], but that will be after he was charged with criminal perjury and fraud, and convicted of misconduct[7.45], for obfuscating AIDS Origins. He and Dr. Fauci will have just lost a lawsuit over patent royalties and a Nobel prize after the court found they had patented the wrong virus and had not discovered it anyway[10.83].24
“Well the most exciting breakthrough is unquestionably the fact that in just a few short years from the recognition that the disease exists, scientists have been able to identify and isolate the underlying cause, or etiologic agent. And AIDS is caused by HTLV3.”
1981
In 1981 the FDA approved the first hepatitis B vaccine. It was made from the blood of those gay men[7.11].
1982
In 1982 doctors wrote: “Fauci, questions in many readers’ minds… The clustering of cases in New York City, Los Angeles, and San Francisco suggests a local factor. It has occurred to me that the hepatitis B vaccine trials used homosexuals in these communities as subjects. In view of the coincidence of the outbreak…were any of the patients involved in the hepatitis B vaccine trials?”[10.57]. Officials replied ‘NO, of course not!’25 The San Francisco Health Department corrected the record: 6 of 10 cases were participants--despite less than 1% of gay men participating[10.30].
1983
In 1983, FDA and CDC officials notified pharmaceutical companies that the agent responsible for AIDS was apparently being transmitted through their plasma-derived products[107.05]. Pharma diverted suspect product overseas, while introducing safer ones in home markets. Merck made the Lot 751 used in the CDC trials using the antigens patented by Alfred Prince. This year they sent the leftovers to South Africa’s apartheid regime to administer exclusively to black communities where “it is most needed”[6.08,6.24]. The FDA told pharma executives they wanted the issue “quietly solved without alerting the Congress, the medical community and the public”, and agreed to “keep out of the public eye” that pharma companies continued selling AIDS-transmitting products to overseas buyers.
In parallel, the Merck vaccine inventor who just said he was going to put Lot 751 into people despite FDA and NIH objections, wrote this paper. Merck’s CEO took it to Congress, testifying "manufacturers have been held responsible… even though the vaccination program was controlled and run by public health officials."[107.03] Congress agreed and quickly passed a law granting Merck absolute immunity, shifting liability to taxpayers.
1984
In 1984 HIV was identified as the causal virus. We’d soon learn half of the participants had already been infected and would soon manifest symptoms[4.30]. Dr. Fauci was promoted to run the agency and lead the government's response[10.59]. Three weeks later the CDC announced the trial’s pivotal vaccine vs placebo rate had decisively settled accusations that government and Big Pharma caused the AIDS pandemic26. The next day the CDC director declared:
“It is clear, absolutely clear, that this vaccine is safe. It does not contain the AIDS virus, and even if it did, the data demonstrate that the virus would be killed by inactivation steps used in the manufacturing process.”
Dr. Fauci said:
Let me tell you another fact… It is very likely that the male homosexuals in New York City, who frequently travel to Port au Prince in Haiti for vacations and for sexual contacts down there, picked up the virus in Haiti.
What the CDC analysis actually said
Only these 2 sentences in red address the experimental 1976 lot 751 that gay men blamed for giving them AIDS[4.20]. Everything else is assuring a panicked public that the newly licensed FDA-approved vaccine, made from the blood of all those dying men used a chemical inactivation process that killed all the HIV.
In the first sentence the CDC committed to compare HIV rates in the men they vaccinated against the men who “did not receive HB vaccine in the vaccine trials”. The only men in the trial who did not receive vaccine are the placebo group half who declined it post-trial. Indeed, it is irrefutable that this would settle the matter. This CDC-conducted, taxpayer-funded, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was designed to prove the vaccine's role in any outcome by comparing vaccine vs placebo rates.
But, in the second sentence note the big switcheroo. Instead of comparing against placebo, they’re now comparing against the group that was excluded from the trial for their existing immunity due to a history of STD’s. Yet, their own trial documents confirmed the "gross bias" of comparing against those who did not participate are "too well known to warrant further discussion”[4.05]. Their behaviors that increased their risk of Hepatitis-B increased their risk of AIDS[4.07].
Reverse engineering the CDC’s math
It seems scientists dismissed this as coincidence because, everyone I’ve spoken to, was under the impression the placebo group suffered a similar fate. I think I was the first to note publicly this seemingly unrelated CDC paper discloses these numbers to calculate the vaccine versus placebo rate in one subset, that included almost half the unvaccinated placebo group. HIV rates were 42% among the fully vaccinated, 25% among the partially vaccinated, and 9% among the unvaccinated placebo[4.15].27
I believe I reverse engineered the CDC’s math using this paper[4.13], and I’m confident the HIV rate for placebo recipients, estimated in green, was low, in the single digits.
But in that excluded group they used for comparison, who also must have contracted HIV sexually, the CDC’s actual rate is shown in blue, reflecting their greater risk. If the chemicals had killed all the HIV in the vaccine, the men who unknowingly received it at random should have had a single-digit rate comparable to the placebo group like this, shown in red. But it appears it was over 5 times higher. So the CDC combined vaccine and placebo into an average rate, cutting in half the HIV rate from vaccine transmission, and comparing that against the higher risk group. But, when the trial ended, it was still double, so they compared 1984 rates after the high risk group caught up with the halved rate, claiming this convergence exonerated the vaccine. If the withheld data confirms this analysis, that'd mean a vaccine still gets their “safe and effective” seal of approval even when they know it killed half their trial participants.
Here are the number of vaccine doses, shown in gray, and the new HIV infections, shown in red. The CDC conceded the first men contracted HIV one year after volunteers were vaccinated in 1976[4.03]. Here are the CDC’s figures for year to year change in HIV rates. The trial and mass vaccination began in 1978[4.03].
The Haiti connection
The scientist recruited to test Dr. Fauci’s Haiti hypothesis is the same one he recruited to prove the Coronavirus’s origin in the Wuhan wet market[7.21,7.22]. Dr. Worobey concurs HIV must have circulated in Haiti since the 1960’s, but never acknowledges that Haiti was America’s principal supplier of donated blood in that era[7.23], and that not one of the nearly 1 million Americans transfused with Haitian blood contracted HIV while they claim the virus was ravaging that country, nor that archived Haitian blood was tested and no HIV was found in samples collected pre-vaccine[7.20].28
Establishment scientists, please, engage in good faith to explain: I accept your argument that the deadly HIV-1B variant must have evolved in man. But why did you conclude the virus came from a few drops of chimp blood in the wound of a clumsy African hunter a century ago, and circled the globe, somehow evolving in Haiti undetected, until arriving in 1978 in the New York gay community, exclusively in vaccine trial participants, without taking into account that same year in that same city in that same community those same trial participants were being inoculated with blood from a New York doctor who may have been transfusing it between man and chimp for decades?
Besides, gay men showed symptoms two years following infection. Why assume Haitians were infected for 20 years with a 10 times longer incubation period? They were infected with the same 2 chimpanzee viruses and manifested the same symptoms one year after gay men. So isn’t it more logical they were infected a year later? Is it a coincidence that a year after vaccinating against sexually transmitted hepatitis in the gay community, the WHO announced they would target endemic hepatitis in underdeveloped regions like Haiti? Was the WHO vaccine made from Dr. Prince's antigens, given his patents and monopoly? Did the WHO overlook this and just assume poor people must be as promiscuous as single gay men recruited in New York bathhouses? We can't FOIA the WHO, so if you have information, please contact us. We are raising a support fund for whistleblowers with relevant information that lawfully belongs in the public domain.
More questions for scientists
Why is HIV’s discoverer labeled an AIDS denialist for claiming HIV was not the sole cause of early AIDS cases? Wasn’t he vindicated with the discovery their condition required simultaneous co-infection with both chimpanzee viruses, as neither alone could cause the condition?[107.06] So what was the other virus causing Kaposi’s Sarcoma only among men at trial sites who did not have HIV?[10.24] Doesn’t this suggest trial participants were also infected with yet another still unidentified virus?
And what about the men who suffered AIDS signature “immune system collapse” who had neither virus?[10.74] Why was this condition also unique to men at trial sites in the 1980’s? Had it previously existed only in these chimpanzees during these gain-of-function-like experiments infecting them with AIDS-related viruses from other species, and sometimes with human tissue from cancer patients and brains apparently from fetuses? Could that have created a novel hybrid virus? Did the chimps that survived infection with lab-created virus cocktails provide the blood they used for the vaccines?
What of the African paradoxes? Dr. Fauci said of all the infants dying in Africa:
We know now, from the work of Bob Gallo and his colleagues, that if you examine the infants with AIDS, and their mothers, the mother in three out of four cases has the virus in an asymptomatic way.
True, but pregnant women were routinely given the same vaccine and how do you explain the other one in four infants dying of AIDS when no one else in the family was infected?[6.13] Apartheid era scientists testified under oath they were trying to reduce black populations with weaponized vaccines, and a worker confessed to transporting vaccines with the AIDS virus to clinics like this run by this white supremacist with no medical training posing as a doctor.
The solution
Skeptics fear “the science” serves the highest bidder and silences opposing views. That's the problem FactMission wants to solve. Skepticism isn't “anti-science”, it’s withholding judgment without having all the facts.
In today's polarized society, controversies ranging from digital ID to the Ukraine War and free speech pit "conspiracy theorists" against "gullible credulists," with no recourse for open-minded individuals seeking informed opinions based on whatever facts all sides can agree on.
FactMission will tackle all these controversies by respectfully inviting experts on all sides to present:
Facts their critics concede are accurate
Opinions as long as there’s no demonstrably false statements
Answers to their critics' toughest questions
Research proposals to test their theories
With your donations FactMission will fund the research, conducted by neutral parties, publishing all results raw and unfiltered. Donations also support whistleblowers' costs to come forward. For AIDS origins, we aim to hire a neutral filmmaker to create a compelling documentary in the public domain that avoids favoritism or conclusions, with sign offs from all sides that their viewpoint was accurately represented.
Compelling the CDC to find the placebo rate in their missing trial data will irrefutably prove if they killed more people than the world wars. So please support ICAN’s legal costs for Siri Glimstad at this link. ICAN agreed to my request for a separate fund, exclusively to secure this trial data, and keep it neutral.
Please consider supporting FactMission, a registered non-profit. Establishing facts is essential to learn from history and avoid repeating it.
Invitation to whistleblowers
With your donations, FactMission funds the research, conducted by neutral parties, publishing all results raw and unfiltered. Donations also support whistleblowers who have information that legally belongs in the public domain. FactMission is not soliciting material that is classified or obtained illegally. The CDC claims the pivotal vaccine vs placebo data to settle vaccine transmission of HIV was “lost”, not “classified”. The scientists who have privately confirmed access are invited to reach out to report@factmission.org.
Invitation to scientists
We are reaching out to the 200+ authors of the scientific papers referenced in this video. All will be respectfully invited to comment on the claims, offering corrections, clarifications, and counter-arguments. Their responses will be updated on this page. If they are on X, we’ll post a link to our outreach.
Ahmann, Peter A.; Alcabes, Philip; Arborio, M.; Arthur, Larry O; Bailes, Elizabeth; Bartelme, Sarah; Beer, B E; Bessonette, J S; Biggar, Robert J; Blackburn, N; Bland, James W.; Boros, Stefano; Bourne, Geoffrey H.; Brettman, Lee; Brewer, Devin; Brody, Stuart; Buchbinder, Susan; Camargo, I F; Cao, Y Z; Caplan, Daniel B.; Carlier, N D; Castilletti, Concetta; Chang, Yuan; Chen, Yalu; Cheng, Amber; Clissold, Leah; Collery, Simon; Cordiali-Fei, Paola; Corrigan, James J.; Cossen, Cynthia K; Courouce, A.M.; Cummins, Larry B; Cunningham-Rundles, Susanna; Cupps, Thomas R; Deinhardt, F; Des Jarlais, Don C; Devesa, Susan S; Di Carlo, Aldo; Digoutte, J.-P.; Eltom, Mohamed A; Farmer, Paul; Fauci, Anthony; Fischinger, Peter J; Fitzgerald, Daniel; Forghani, Bagher; Friedman, Samuel R; Friedman-Kien, A E; Ganem, Don; Gao, Feng; Gaspar, A M; Gelman, I H; Gerety, Robert J; Gerin, John L; Giavedoni, Luis D; Gilbert, M. Thomas P.; Gilden, Raymond V; Gisselquist, David; Giuliani, Massimo; Goedert, James J; Golden, J A; Goldsmith, Paul K; Gomes, D F; Graham, Charles E; Granade, Timothy; Graves, Alison; Greene, Jeffrey B; Greensill, J; Greenwood, Edward J. D.; Gridley, Melissa J; Griffet, P.; Guerra, Bernadette; Guiraud, M.; Gust, I. D.; Hahn, Beatrice H; Harley, Edward J; Harley, E J; Hartell, Cycil; Heeney, Jonathan L; Heneine, Walid; Hodara, Vida L; Holzman, Robert S; Hoyland, J. A.; Jaffe, Harold W; Jemal, Ahmedin; Johnson, Joyce M; Johnson, Warren; Johnson, S; Jouan, A.; Kane, Mark A; Kedes, Dean; Keeling, M E; Kelliher, John C; Kellner, Aaron; Kew, M C; Koblin, Beryl A; Koenig, Serena; Kondova, Ivanela; Kreek, Mary Jeanne; Lanford, Robert E; Lange, Michael; Laurence, J; Le Guenno, B.; Lemey, Philippe; Li, J J; Lyn Behrens, B.; MacDonell, Robert C.; Macrae, Donald R; Malaza, Elina Kunene Jane; Malison, Michael D; Marmor, Michael; Martin, Jeffrey N; Marx, Preston; Maslansky, Robert; Masur, Henry; Mbulaiteye, Sam M; McAnerney, J M; McCutcheon, J P; McKay, Richard A; McLay, Kirsten; Mercadante, L A; Metzgar, Richard S.; Michael, Scott F; Michelis, Mary Ann; Mildvan, Donna; Mirabile, M; Mitchell, A D; Molden, Jaime; Moore, G T; Moore, Patrick S; Morse, S; Murray, Henry W; Murthy, Krishna K; Murthy, K K; N'Diaye, B.; Nestor, M S; Niphuis, Henk; Novick, David M; O'Brien, Thomas R; Offit, Paul; Onorato, Ida; Osmond, Dennis H; Palamara, Guido; Pape, Jean William; Patterson, Joseph H.; Peeters, Martine; Peterman, T A; Pitchenik, Arthur E; Poleski, Martin H; Polkowski, Jane; Potterat, John; Prince, ; Prozesky, O W; Purcell, Robert H; Rambaut, Andrew; Redrobe, Sharon; Rezza, Giovanni; Rivers, Shirley L; Robertson, David L; Robey, W. Gerard; Rodenburg, Cynthia M; Rolka, H; Rosenberg, Philip S; Rouet, François; Saltzman, B R; Schable, Charles A; Schattner, E; Schatzmayr, H G; Schmidt, Fabian; Scholtz, J E; Schoub, B D; Schulz, T F; Seigler, H.F.; Seignot, P.; Shabangu, Abigail; Sharp, Paul M; Shaw, George M; Sheldon, J A; Siegal, F P; Sotheran, Jo L; Soulier, J.P.; Spira, Thomas J; Stevens, Cladd E; Stevens, C. E.; Suchard, Marc A; Szmuness, Wolf; Tabor, Edward; Teuwen, Dirk E; Thomas, Pauline; van Rooyen, Linda; Vande Stouwe, Robert A; Vittinghoff, Eric; Vnek, ; Watts, Thomas D; Weber, John; Wlasiuk, Gabriela; Wormser, Gary; Worobey, Michael; Wright, Peter; Yancovitz, Stanley R; Yoshida, C F; Zang, Edith A; Zwiren, Gerald T.
The spreadsheet includes full text links, as well as Google Drive links. If you need access to a restricted document, email the ID to aaron@factmission.org. Drive links for documents will be changed to ‘public’ if they are not copyrighted.
US Patents 4,118,478 and 3,951,937 explain a typical chimp bleeding to get HBsAG antigens for the Hepatitis-B vaccines resulted in about 7,000 ml of plasma, yielding 0.1 to 1.0 mg of antigen per ml, or 700,000µg to 7,000,000µg per bleeding. t 40 µg/dose = 17,500 to 175,000 doses/bleeding. It states the chimps “can be conveniently plasmaphoresed at frequent intervals without damage to their health or reduction in [antigen] content”, showing each chimp was used for multiple bleedings. Thus it’s possible one chimp could have yielded 1 million doses. He had ~200 chimps in the US at LEMSIP[4.26] and established a “catch-and-release” for mass production in Liberia at Vilab II per his autobiography, where wild chimps were infected with hepatitis, antigens harvested, and released. Some reports suggest around 800 chimps were used this way. He never revealed how many bleedings he could carry out per chimp following infection, nor how many chimps provided antigens. But even the most conservative estimates suggest he had enough antigens for at least 10 million doses and possibly 100 million or more. While his autobiography describes the catch and release as a more humane method, clearly it was also a more cost-effective method for mass production of antigens, and he confirm asserting patent rights globally, requiring all Hepatitis-B vaccines to use or license his antigens.
The only one not expressly stated is the WHO vaccine. There were surveys in Brazil to test Hepatitis-B vaccines[10.72] and in a 1976 meeting in Brazilia the WHO confirmed seroprevalence surveys would begin in the Caribbean[10.48], and later reported that Haiti was the only nation in the Western Hemisphere with high rates[10.32]. Prince's memoirs mention working with international organizations in the 1970's to administer vaccines licensed under his patents, but without details. References to a WHO/PAHO campaign in the Caribbean lack citations. The only reference on the WHO/PAHO site refers to the seroprevalence surveys so the vaccination campaign is unclear.
See for example Alan Cantwell’s 1988 AIDS And The Doctors of Death arguing HIV must have been added to Lot 751, as he assumes it was made from human blood
Arvid Noe of Norway was confirmed, but the infection traced to infection ~1962 in Africa. Further it was a different variant, Group O, and death occurred 15 years after infection. By contrast, the gay men in the New York trial were all negative in 1976, the first contracted the deadly new HIV-1B variant in 1977 or 1978, and some like Rick Wellikoff died in 1980. David Carr was exposed as a hoax. Also the gay men were simultaneously infected with a 2nd virus also originating in those chimpanzees, Kaposi’s Sarcoma Herpes Virus, which was responsible for the caner and may have accelerated disease progression. Robert Rayford’s samples were disputed, and the samples Robert Garry claimed proved transmission were “inadvertently destroyed”. David Carr’s samples were exposed as a hoax. In the Western Hemisphere the first undisputed suspected case was the girl born in 1974 in New York to a drug user, the first undisputed indirect evidence were the 3 babies born to New York drug users in 1977 who later tested HIV+, and the first direct evidence are the 1978 samples provided by men participating in the gay trials.
HIV was likely circulating among New York’s heroin users since their inoculation in 1973 but there’s no mention of archived blood being available to test.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Rayford
It’s unclear what role Dr. Fauci played in the development of the chimpanzee-based Hepatitis-B vaccines between 1971 and 1977. He worked at the agency, becoming Deputy Director in 1977, and Director in 1984, at which point he led the government’s response.
Samples from US research chimpanzees tested HIV+ when a test was available in the 1980’s. It was later determined to be SIVcpzus with more advanced testing in the 1990’s. They were the only lab-confirmed, undisputed HIV+ beings in the Western Hemisphere when the first chimpanzee-based vaccines were given. Note: It’s unclear what year that was since there’s mention of human volutneers in 1974[4.27] and of testing Lot 751 in 1976. However, it appears the first evidence of HIV-infection was in 1977 when babies were born to heroin users and later tested positive, and the first mention of lab-confirmed HIV+ human samples is from cohort members in 1978, with no mention of whether or not they received vaccine, either as part of the 1976 volunteers, or in the NYBC or CDC trials. To disprove this SOF, please provide credible, verified evidence of early human samples collected in the Western Hemisphere before vaccination.
Since 1959 HIV was found in Kinshasa, Congo and in a handful of cases connected to Kinshasa. Early Hepatitis-B vaccines from Pasteur were administered in West and Central Africa in the late 1970’s[10.07,10.08], and it appears the virus was spreading in that region by around 1981. However, South Africa’s first HIV-cases were gay men after the virus was imported from the US in 1982[6.06]. Prior to the Lot 751 trial in Kangwane (the Swazi of South Africa), 1,495 samples were collected, and presumably among the tens of thousands tested when it was determined the first HIV+ samples among black, heterosexual communities were collected around 1987[6.07,6.08,6.24,107.02]. Thus, the claim is made that South Africa’s straight black communities were AIDS-free prior to the Lot 751 trials.
Grant list available at NIH Reporter. $17 million is the total of results searching for “Garry, Robert F” with “AIDS” in the subject
The document[4.27] only states the antigens came from “plasma” domors, not specifying the species. However, Dr. Prince had filed his patent the prior year and specified that a vaccine was being made from Hepatitis-B antigens of subtype ad+ay, and the following year the NIAID scientists reported this vaccine using the ad+ay subtype, and there is no mention of any other ad+ay antigen provider. It appears Dr. Prince’s patent gave him an effective monopoly on antigen supply at this time. His “human” plasma may have contained traces of chimpanzee plasma because his patients with chronic Hepatitis who could have provided the antigens were sometimes treated with “cross-ciruclation” experiments using chimpanzees. This SOF will be corrected if there is clear evidence that Prince’s antigens were used in a different vaccine.
It’s unclear how common the cross circulation was, and his comments in the New York Times about chimps paying their dues to society was primarily addressing their use to test vaccines. He provided very little comment about the cross-circulation treatments, perhaps due to the extreme risk.
Like the 1974 NIAID vaccine, Merck’s documentation for Lot 751 is ambiguous on the species, while other lots like 559 and 761 state “human” antigens were used. Lot 751 was made in 1976 of antigens of purely the ‘adw’ subtype[4.05], and Dr. Prince documented collecting pure adw antigens in 1976[3.28] and his patent states they were used to make “vaccine example #1”[4.04]. Claim this SOF with demonstrable evidence that Prince’s vaccine example #1 was not Merck’s Lot 751.
His book is vague about the exact nature of the harvesting. He generally refers to chimpanzees being used to test vaccines being given to humans, which was clearly less controversial than harvesting their biomaterial.
A chimp named “Marilyn” tested HIV+, later determined to be the SIVcpzus variant, which along with SIVcpzgab1 and 2 are the closest ancestors to HIV-1b.
Although not a statement of fact, it appears antigens for commercial vaccines were harvested in underdeveloped endemic areas with poor sanitation. Clarification is welcome. There is little written about harvesting, except in gay men, and information on their informed consent is scarce. Paul Offit claimed New York drug users supplied antigens, but nothing is in the published literature. Officials likely did not want the public to know the active ingredient in vaccines came from drug users in "flophouses." The WHO mentions only seroprevalence surveys in Brazil and the Caribbean in 1976. It is understandable they did not publicize the exploitation of impoverished populations providing valuable biomaterial for free. Clarification is welcome, and we offer an additional $1,000 reward for evidence of any harvesting program in Haiti.
The claim about lethality is based on finding ~10% of prostitutes in Kinshasa were infected as of the 1970’s, and the rate was holding steady, and there were no unusual reports of them dying in large numbers.
They were mostly concerned with non-a, non-b Hepatits, as HIV was unknown.
There still seems to be debate about HHV-8’s transmission, and a lack of research. The claim is merely repeating what some credible scientists reported.
Patented the wrong virus refers to their claim it was a leukemia virus.
The “No, of course not” refers to New York officials reply.
See the section what the CDC analysis actually says, since the document uses ambiguous phrases
We will gladly pay $1,000 to anyone who produces full, verifiable trial data, whether it supports or refutes vaccine transmission. Disproving this statement requires proof that the vaccine vs. placebo rate was comparable when the trial ended. The combined rate of all trial participants was >40%, so we need to know only the rate of the fully vaccinated or the unvaccinated. The rate of the fully vaccinated in the Hadler paper is inconclusive, as this subset included those who later contracted Hepatitis, and their protection may skew results. Therefore, the focus is the unvaccinated rate in Hadler, as those men had no protection against any viruses. Assuming about half of the placebo group rejected the vaccine, as in the New York trial, the 148 in the Hadler paper includes nearly half the unvaccinated placebo, notably those who later contracted Hepatitis. Given Hepatitis-B's high transmissibility, it is expected that half of the unvaccinated would catch it, and the half that did not, presumably practiced safe sex. If they did not contract Hepatitis, they likely would have been less likely to contract the less transmissible HIV. Hessol confirms those who contracted Hepatitis had a higher risk of HIV. Since Hadler reported 9% among the unvaccinated who did contract Hepatitis-B, it is assumed the unvaccinated who did not contract it had a very low rate of HIV. This underpins the video's assumption that the overall HIV rate in the unvaccinated must have been lower than the 9% in Hadler. This implies the HIV rate in the fully vaccinated must have been high since the average rate was 40%. Any additional clarification is welcome, and if any assumptions are wrong, they will be corrected, though proving the statement wrong means the vaccine and placebo rates were comparable.
To disprove this, we need evidence of transmission. Haitians allegedly sold 5,000-6,000 liters per month during that era, with a "unit" being ½ liter, amounting to roughly 10,000 units per month, 120,000 per year. It’s conservative to estimate that Americans received a million units of Haitian blood during the 1960s and 70s when Drs. Fauci and Worobey claim HIV was spreading in Haiti. Therefore, if their claim is accurate, there should be early AIDS cases from pre-1977 blood transfusions. If none are found, it suggests Fauci’s and Worobey’s Haiti connection is unlikely.
Share this post