Playback speed
×
Share post
Share post at current time
0:00
/
0:00
Transcript

WHO's private concerns over AIDS and chimpanzee-plasma derived vaccines they later liquidated in Africa

Books given to participants of 1982 and 1984 WHO Symposia document their internal meetings: Were these the most unethical medical experiments since WWII?

This video presents data from our new preprint on Zenodo, X and ResearchGate and doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13249977 and as a PDF download:

Chimpanzee Plasma Vaccine Zenodo 6 Aug 2024
9.83MB ∙ PDF file
Download
Download

Responses will be cataloged to show if the facts are disputed, or if experts can only respond “no comment”.

PLEASE help us tag experts for public fact-checking

Few believe it's possible that thousands of trusted health leaders know and kept out of the public eye that:

  • When AIDS was first recognized, global health leaders immediately implicated (in writing) a virus in the chimpanzee plasma-derived vaccines tested on American gay men.

  • After the chimpanzee blood used to make the vaccines tested HIV+ and the blood samples from the gay men in the vaccine trial was entirely HIV- in when collected in 1977 pre-trial and post over 40% were HIV+, while the unvaccinated placebo group was largely spared…

  • Then developed nations prohibited these vaccines, never again mentioned their existence in any public document, refiled the patents and revised the ingredient labels changing “plasma of chimpanzees” to “plasma of carriers”, and liquidated them for 95 cents to use in poor countries.

  • Thousands knew and said nothing as Merck continued supplying chimpanzee-plasma-derived vaccines with species-ambiguous labels to the WHO to administer in Africa for many years. Simultaneously, Merck patented its highly profitable AIDS drug, Crixivan, based on a taxpayer funded invention from Anthony Fauci’s agency. Scientists demonstrated only a small minority of AIDS cases in Africa could be attributed to sexual transmission.1

But it takes just a minute to check these 4 images of public, government documents from 1975, 78, 82 and 84 laying it all out:

Even though our preprint merely quotes public documents without speculation, it’s being censored on mainstream platforms. So, please, let’s tag experts on X for comment with #chimpvax, allowing the final paper to demonstrate whether these facts are undisputed, and the global elite’s truth arbiters conceal evidence of their misconduct under the guise of “misinformation.”

If you're on X (aka Twitter), please visit our post, quote it, and tag respected scientists, doctors, and health leaders to publicly fact-check and verify the claims. If they can refute the claims, we'll publicly apologize for spreading misinformation. But if they respond with "no comment" because the evidence is undeniable, we'll use their silence in the final version of our paper for peer review and publishing, proving that, as outrageous as this sounds, it's factually accurate and uncontested. Hopefully, the public will then demand accountability.

Finally, since the CDC refuses to comply with our FOIA request to release trial data that could definitively settle the controversy, please consider a tax-deductible donation at FactMission.org to cover the legal costs of pursuing depositions from those with first-hand knowledge. FactMission is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, and we promise full transparency and to release all findings.

Video script

This book given to participants of the World Health Organization's 1982 Symposium in Athens details their internal meetings.  The scanned copy at archive.org reveals what they said privately about the origin of AIDS.

Note the WHO reported that four lots of this Hepatitis-B vaccine were made from the blood plasma of chimpanzees and had been used in two clinical trials.  The vaccine maker called their earlier New York trial on gay men a disaster.  The WHO warned “much controversy still exists… over possible presence of… AIDS viral agents in the plasma from which the vaccine’s active ingredient was isolated."

Six months later, HIV was identified, enabling blood sample testing. Archived blood from this chimpanzee used to make the vaccine tested positive for HIV. She had been inoculated with blood containing the human Hepatitis virus, and then her blood was harvested in a process detailed in these patents. However, after the trials on gay men, the companies refiled the patents, replacing the references to chimpanzee blood with terms like “blood plasma, e.g., human blood plasma.”

The same vaccine maker then presented at the 1984 WHO Symposium on Africa. He offered the same four vaccine lots, admitted they were prohibited in Europe, changed the ingredient label from “plasma of chimpanzees” to “plasma of carriers”, and liquidated them for 95 cents in the African market, while human blood brands continued selling for $100 in wealthy nations.  The chimpanzee-based brands were then “widely used,” though always with species-ambiguous language to mask their non-human origin.

Many books, like this one from Paul Offit, refute accusations the vaccine transmitted HIV.  But they only mention the human blood versions.  HIV is a chimpanzee virus, yet not one of them even acknowledges chimpanzee-blood-based vaccines ever existed.  Since they clearly did, we wrote this preprint to establish the facts about chimpanzee-based vaccines.

Even if the vaccines were safe, informed consent remains an issue. African doctors administered chimpanzee-blood vaccines while claiming they were the same human blood versions used in wealthier countries. After learning that AIDS originated from chimpanzee blood in a hunter's wound, Africans might not have willingly consented to chimpanzee blood injections from the same company patenting this $10,000/year AIDS drug, based on this taxpayer-funded invention from Anthony Fauci’s agency.

We aim to establish whether our preprint’s claims are contested, or if experts with firsthand knowledge can only respond with “no comment.”  Please quote it, asking experts to verify the claims, and, since the CDC only released partial figures, ask for their calculation of HIV rates in vaccine versus placebo recipients in the trial they privately called a disaster. The final paper will list everyone tagged, along with an AI-generated summary of each response, showing whether evidence was presented to refute the claims.

If experts confirm our calculation, why did no one come forward?  Did millions die because a public-private censorship partnership silenced whistleblowers and free speech outlets?

The CDC refuses to comply with my FOIA for data on those  trials, so we want to pursue depositions. Please consider a tax-deductible donation to help cover the cost.  We promise full transparency and to publish all findings. Thank you.

1

https://sites.google.com/site/davidgisselquist/stoppingbloodbornehiv

Discussion about this podcast