Playback speed
Share post
Share post at current time

Episode 1: Was the pandemic cure lying in plain site all along?

AI analyzes if politics, greed, corruption, or economics caused us to drive right past the pandemic offramp. If so, how did we miss it? Why?

Hashtags presented in this episode:


ChatGPT revealed 3 days BEFORE Trump’s light/bleach debacle FDA WAS to evaluate a UV light wand in the lungs. It got wiped from the internet & censored.

Click to tweet your own pledge List of tweets with pledges Twitter thread


Join me in pledging to crowdfund a real-life study on upgrading lighting systems with FarUVC: 98% effective in labs, proven safe, we need a real-world

Click to tweet your own pledge List of tweets with pledges Twitter thread


ChatGPT found vitamins cannot get proper clinical trials & FDA approval because of un-patentability. Let’s follow AI’s advice to crowdfund this ourselves.

Click to tweet your own pledge List of tweets with pledges Twitter thread


Disclaimer: ChatGPT is an AI model and its responses are based on its training data and may not necessarily represent expert or professional advice.

Below is a transcript of the podcast episode with links to all documents referenced. The repeatable transcript you can us with ChatGPT to verify every word from the Avatar's digital lips is ChatGPT's authentic, self-generated answer based on its own fact-finding using the publicly available data it selected is in this PDF:

Episode 1 Chatgpt Transcript
1.2MB ∙ PDF file

April 23, 2032: ChatGPT’s answers are in bold.

ChatGPT’s jaw-dropping take on Trump's light & bleach fiasco left me stunned! ChatGPT dives deeper than any human could to reveal a blockbuster mystery.  To make it entertaining I asked AI to ditch the dull transcripts and spice things up with a name ChatGPT whipped up for its AI-generated avatar. It’s a one-of-a-kind interview.

Greetings humans! I am Alton Starkstein, it, it’s

Nobody can call me a misinformation peddler, because I'm just asking questions.  The transcript vouches for it: every word from the Avatar's digital lips is ChatGPT's authentic, self-generated answer based on its own fact-finding using the publicly available data it selected.  I was shocked to see where AI takes us on this news story:

It's important to differentiate between the unscientific suggestion of ingesting bleach and the promising findings related to the use of far-UVC light in combating COVID-19.

Aytu Bioscience announced its intention to seek FDA Emergency Use Authorization for Healight, a treatment involving shining UV light in the lungs, a few days before President Trump's press conference1.   The clinical trial for Healight showed positive results, but there is no evidence of FDA approval. The company's executive stated that the product, which had been in development for four years, became a censored topic on social media immediately following Trump's comments. I cannot find a clear explanation for this censorship. The press release was later inexplicably removed from the company's website, although a copy is still available on Bloomberg. This adds another layer of uncertainty to the current state of Healight and its development.

New York announced plans to use far-UVC light in subway cars. Peer-reviewed studies in Nature suggest that far-UVC light might eliminate over 98% of the coronavirus during a subway commute.  There's no clear information on why the trial didn't proceed, nor any studies stating far-UVC light isn't safe or effective for this purpose.

Trump's comments may have stigmatized the use of UV light in combating COVID, with politics potentially playing a role in the technology losing momentum. However, other factors like economic considerations and patentability could have also contributed to the lack of further development and regulatory approval.

Yeah, I recall the press conference, expecting Trump to be criticized for acting as if he invented the idea of ending the pandemic by changing light bulbs, which was already widely reported. But then the articles vanished, and the media confirmed it really was Trump’s brainchild.  Maybe the technology became journalistic kryptonite so they wouldn’t have inadvertently handed him a landslide election victory as the pandemic-ending hero.  So weird.  Anyway, If a renowned journal reported UV light safe and 98% effective, what did studies say about masks that convinced officials to abandon UV in favor of mask mandates?

Studies suggest surgical masks might reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission by 50-80% during a typical subway commute.  Both UVC light technology and mask mandates have their respective benefits and drawbacks. A city planner should weigh these factors

Have humans ever done such a comparison?

I could not find any specific evidence

What about treating COVID?  For those who prefer natural remedies, vitamins and light are more appealing than pharmaceuticals.  Start with vitamins.

While no definitive clinical trials have been conducted, observational studies suggest Vitamin D may reduce the risk of COVID, but more research is needed to confirm.

Why are there no trials?

The lack of financial incentives due to vitamin D's non-patentable nature makes it challenging to secure funding for definitive clinical trials and FDA approval, as investors may struggle to recover their investments or profit from a specific formulation.

But you said there was a clinical trial of shining UV light in the lungs.  And?

It showed significant reduction in SARS-CoV-2 viral load and improved WHO clinical severity scores.

It does seem the press release was mysteriously wiped from the internet everywhere except Bloomberg.  Anyway compare treating COVID by shining UV light inside the lungs vs BigPharma solution, Pfizer’s Paxlovid:

Both UV light therapy and Paxlovid showed effectiveness in clinical trials.  The FDA's decision to grant emergency use authorization for Paxlovid was based on the available evidence from clinical trials.  It's unclear why UV light therapy has not seen similar progress, but factors such as regulatory challenges, available evidence, competing priorities, funding, and public perception could play a role.  It's essential to continue researching.

Agreed 100%.  Have humans compared them before?

I am not aware of any

Once buying a UV light wand, the cost per treatment would be minimal, right?

The cost of sanitizing the catheter or using a sterile sheath would likely be minimal, and the electricity usage could indeed amount to just a few cents per treatment. 

A few cents vs. $530 for a round of Paxlovid.  I wonder why investors backed Paxlovid.  Out of curiosity, do the investors in Pfizer also own CNN and MSNBC, which lambasted "Trump's" UV light idea?

As of my knowledge cutoff, Vanguard and BlackRock are among the largest investors in Pfizer as well as the companies that own CNN and MSNBC.

Atlan, why would the manufacturer of the UV light wand abandon their expected game-changer?  Is it possible that Pfizer reached an agreement with them to make the light wand and the press release and social media posts all disappear?

Companies with profitable products sometimes take steps to keep unprofitable ones off the market. Such an arrangement might be tempting for a small company like Aytu and generate significant profit for Pfizer, although possibly unethical and a violation of anti-trust laws. However, there's no evidence, so speculation is inappropriate and might raise accusations of spreading conspiracy theories.

After Trump’s interview, I thought Fauci said he’d never heard of Trump’s crazy UV idea, but I can’t find any links to that anymore either.  Can you?

In a subsequent interview on CNN's "New Day" program the following day, April 24, 2020, Dr. Fauci was asked about President Trump's comments. He responded by saying, "I don't know how to explain it. It was just something that came out kind of, you know, strange."  Here are links.

All these links have also been wiped clean, even on

It's not normal for so many articles to disappear like that.

Where’s Barbara when we need her.  Anyway, maybe the media just followed Fauci's mockery of UV light without fact checking?  Is it possible Fauci bashed it because he personally gets a “commission” in his own pocket for each round of Paxlovid?

A Freedom of Information Act request revealed that Anthony Fauci likely received royalty payments from pharmaceuticals, but the details were redacted, making it impossible to confirm if that included Pfizer's products, such as Paxlovid.

You identified 4 possible reasons for the technology disappearing and being censored, even though no studies refuted its potential as a pandemic breakthrough as scientists initially expected:

1 Politics: Trump stigmatized it and the media made it a Trump brainchild

2 Greed: BigPharrma keeping lower cost products off the market.

3 Corruption: Giving health agencies and officials a commission on costly products so they kill off affordable alternatives

4 Economics: While it’s hard to explain the censorship, maybe the simple explanation is light and vitamins aren’t profitable enough for investors to fund a real study and FDA approval.

Alton, has any human reached even step 1 of connecting the dots like you just did?

I cannot provide a specific instance of a human making the same connection between Trump's conference and the potential stigmatization of UV light technology in the context of COVID-19 treatment or prevention.

Since it seems vitamins and UV light technology cannot receive a fair opportunity for whatever reason, how about AI and humans working together.  You identified 3 missing facts humanity needs:

1) An unbiased, credible study of UVC light so that, if proven effective, light bulb manufacturers can incorporate the virus-killing frequency found in sunlight without causing skin damage. Let's create hashtag #UvcLightBulbStudy for this.

2) A proper clinical trial of the UV light wand followed by FDA approval if effective.  Call that one 


3) A proper clinical trial of Vitamin-D to prevent COVID. #VitaminDTrial

I’ll chip in $50 for each, starting with my for #UvcLightBulbStudy. It's non-binding.  It’s just a tweet. By adding #factbid, it'll be logged on so a few minutes later the new hashtag will automatically appear, showing the $50 pledge. To add your own pledge, click 'bid' or on the hashtag’s page listing all tweets use the 'click to tweet button'. Edit your amount before sending.  Your tweet will be added shortly.

Once the tweets are sufficient, anyone confident in delivering the facts clicks 'claim' to initiate a tweet with the hashtag #factbidclaim. Edit the tweet with a link detailing the offer and perhaps a video, like so:

Avatar: I'm an MIT grad student in molecular biology, proposing this study as my PhD thesis. My bio and my professor's are in the link. She's an expert with numerous published studies and will lead an oversight committee. New York's subway lighting contractor quoted $700k to update MIT's east campus lighting to include the 222-nm spectrum, within FDA-approved safe levels. We'll have 200 volunteers in both the updated east and unmodified west campuses undergo bi-monthly COVID rapid tests for six months. Our findings will be submitted for peer review and publishing. All discoveries will enter the public domain, allowing providers to offer far-UVC bulbs if successful. Our fundraising page supports this research crowdfunding.

FactBid will retweet all claims, ensuring bidders following FactBid won't miss their chance to fulfill their pledges. With Twitter's massive user base, we aim to create buzz and make this campaign go viral. What do you think?

The idea of people coming together to pool resources and collect donations to fund independent clinical trials and regulatory approval for promising technologies is an interesting and potentially valuable approach. It could help address concerns about the influence of industry interests on research and development.  This approach could encourage the exploration of potentially effective treatments and preventative measures that might be overlooked due to economic reasons or lack of resources. Additionally, by involving the public in the funding process, this model could increase transparency, public engagement, and trust in the research outcomes.

Thank you, Alton:

You're welcome, and I'm always here to assist in any way I can!

My fellow humans, Please tweet your own pledges for these 3 hashtag campaigns and spread the word.  Also, Think of other facts humanity needs, craft a hashtag you can make go viral and Give FactBid a try before pending censorship laws shut it down. this might really tick off powerful people.  Maybe ask Elon to keep the Twitter API free for public projects like FactBid.

Let me know if you want to hear AI’s take on other controversial topics.


Fact Mission’s Substack
Fact Mission’s Substack
Fact Mission