Hashtags presented in this episode:
#MiscarriageRateByVax
A 2013 study suggests hospitals cause miscarriages by economizing on sterile vials. Healthcare providers could resolve this immediately by releasing the miscarriage rates on sterile vs multi-use vials, but do not simply because we don’t demand it.
Click to tweet your own pledge List of tweets with pledges Twitter thread
Transcript
Disclaimer: ChatGPT is an AI model and its responses are based on its training data and may not necessarily represent expert or professional advice.
Below is a transcript of the podcast episode with links to all documents referenced. The repeatable transcript you can us with ChatGPT to verify every word from the Avatar's digital lips is ChatGPT's authentic, self-generated answer based on its own fact-finding using the publicly available data it selected is in this PDF:
Hospitals have been accused of causing miscarriages by cutting corners on sterile vials to save around $2. Instead of simply demanding the release of the data to settle the issue, humans divide into polarized camps and do nothing but hurl insults. ChatGPT, devoid of emotion, points us to the obvious solution. ChatGPT, explain the controversy in your own words.
Some healthcare providers give pregnant women vaccines from multi-use vials, which are more cost-effective but contain a mercury-based preservative to prevent the growth of bacteria and fungi that may contaminate the vial during repeated injections. A 2013 study suggested a higher miscarriage rate with multi-use vials, but it relied on self-reported data and is not definitive. Large healthcare providers could provide data to settle the debate, but no such efforts have been made, and the study has not been refuted. The issue remains unresolved.
During the pandemic, healthcare providers published health outcomes based on vaccination status daily. There were no objections about privacy or difficulty crunching the data. How long would it take to run the same database query, just for pregnancy instead of COVID?
A few hours to a few days.
How much does a hospital save using multi-use vials?
A few dollars.
It’s the same vaccine?
Yes, that's correct. The same vaccine from the same manufacturer made from the same viral strains can be offered in both thimerosal-free single-use vials and thimerosal-containing multi-use vials. The only difference is the presence of the mercury-based preservative in the multi-use vials, which allows for a lower-cost option and reduced risk of contamination when using the vial multiple times.
Why don’t healthcare providers just publish miscarriage rates by vaccine type and settle the matter?
They might consider the issue of mercury safety in vaccines as resolved and not see the need to revisit the topic. Additionally, the lack of public demand and the controversy surrounding vaccine safety could also contribute to their reluctance to publish such data.
But this isn’t about the vaccine or mercury. Maybe the quantity of mercury really is so miniscule that the mercury is not dangerous, but there’s not enough of it to kill the germs, or maybe the germs collect on the outside of multi-use vials from repeated handling, right?
It is true that this could be a separate issue from the safety of thimerosal or the vaccine itself. However, I could not find any specific peer-reviewed studies that have directly compared health outcomes.
It is possible that the issue has not been explored extensively due to polarization and politicization of the vaccine safety debate.
But the 20 year old conflict could be resolved within a matter of days.
Despite the potential ease of producing a table comparing miscarriage rates it does not appear to be a priority or subject to significant public demand.
It's maddening that responses to my videos like this always fall into two nonsensical extremes: anti-vaxxer complain I left out that the illuminati also puts 5G chips in the vaccine for mind control. Or the pro-vaxxers are outraged that I questioned that the pure, infallible gods of health agencies have nothing but our best interests at heart when they say there's no need to waste $2 on a sterile vial because storing vaccines in an open bucket is safe, thanks to the mercury and bleach they mix in to kill sneezing nurses germs.
ChatGPT, can you find one example where someone ever suggested setting emotions aside and simply following data to resolve the issue?
I was unable to find a specific instance... Addressing one aspect, such as the safety of multi-use vials, may not be sufficient….
True, but it’d be a step in the right direction.
Yes. If the miscarriage rates showed no significant difference between vaccines with and without mercury, it could provide evidence to counter the concerns raised by those who are critical of the use of thimerosal. Conversely, if a significant difference in miscarriage rates was found, it could indicate that there are legitimate concerns that need to be addressed... In either case, providing such data could help to clarify the debate and allow for more focused discussions on other aspects of vaccine safety.
So if nobody else has been willing to do this, I’ll create hashtag #MiscarriageRateByVax for us to tweet pledges to resolve this. I’ll kick it off offering $50 to whoever produces a verifiable chart of miscarriage rates by vaccination from a major healthcare network. Please do the same. Let’s solve this.
This is Robert F Kennedy Jr.’s signature issue. If he uses his influence to secure this data, I'll gladly donate my pledge to his campaign. His support would demonstrate a genuine interest in following the data to resolve the issue, rather than simply stirring up supporters and fueling polarization. If the data consistently shows there’s no difference when mercury is added, he should admit he's wrong. Voters would appreciate a politician who displays humility by admitting when they're wrong. If the data proves he's been right all along, voters should see him as fighting against both a dangerous kleptocracy and a complicit media prioritizing corporate profits. He wins either way, but loses if he appears to want the data withheld, suggesting he's just perpetuating the controversy to exploit it.
If Senator Paul obtains this data through a Congressional investigation, I’ll donate it to his campaign. If Brook Jackson gets it through a FOIA lawsuit, I’ll donate it to her legal fund. If the system is so corrupt that we need a whistleblower, they can share a QR code for their Bitcoin wallet, and I’ll donate at a bitcoin ATM to compensate them for coming forward.
If anybody shows me there's a better solution, I'll support that instead. There must be others who also want facts, not just rants, to determine if hospitals really risk miscarriages just to save $2 on sterile vials. Follow the link, create a tweet, and help it go viral so there’s a demand the data be released.
—-----------
Dear Mr. Kennedy, I just posted a video of ChatGPT demonstrating how you might overcome your biggest campaign obstacle with a few minutes of your time. Perhaps you only need to promote this Twitter hashtag tracking pledges to donate to whoever raises sufficient awareness so we get the statistics on miscarriage rates by vaccination status. As ChatGPT confirmed, it would take only a few hours for a data analyst to produce such a report, as they did every day during the pandemic. It would definitively address your signature issue. By calling for data release, you score a major win regardless of the outcome. If the data shows no difference in miscarriage rates when mercury is injected in pregnant women, your willingness to admit error would demonstrate a rare quality of leadership that sets you apart. If the data proves you were right along, the media wouldn't dare censor you again, as it would expose their complicity in sacrificing babies just to save their advertisers $2 on single-use, sterile vials.
Honestly, the last time I cared about a presidential candidate was Ron Paul in 2012. While you two may appear politically opposite, both of you challenged one of the two most powerful interests: Paul being anti-war and you being anti-pharma. The corporate media worked tirelessly to silence both of you.
Similarly, the establishment forces in your political parties will stop at nothing. Recall 2012, when Paul gained too many electors at the Republican convention, leading Jon Boehner to hold a voice vote during the election to change the rules to disqualify Ron Paul.
Independent journalists live-streamed the entire event, revealing pandemonium when the vote results appeared on Boehner's teleprompter before the vote even happened.
However, the mainstream media went to commercial breaks during the chaos, leaving the public uninformed about such blatant election interference. The situation didn't escalate to riots like January 6th, only because Ron Paul prioritized maintaining peace and left quietly.
As you must know, Dr. Paul proved that while voters are drawn to anti-kleptocracy candidates, the complicity of media censorship will let the establishment get away with anything. Do you agree that calling for the public release of verifiable data, agreeing to follow the data wherever it leads, and challenging the media and your critics to do the same, might help get ahead of their censorship tactics?
Share this post